Let's not be subtle, Rep. Anderson |
The rep for 12A
I
have never met this politico. We know he's an incumbent because the
flier says "re-elect." But his political party? Apparently we're not
supposed to know. Oh, I happen to know he's Republican. He's our
District 12A representative.
Word
is, Anderson is a reasonable person not in league with some of the more
headline-grabbing members of his GOP flock. So he's "normal." But what
does it say about the political party if one has to designate certain of
its members as normal?
So,
Anderson is not like some of the Republicans on the national stage who
can be wild and unhinged. Let's say he's pragmatic? Is he an actual
outlier in the Republican Party in this regard?
Unlike
Kristi Noem, I don't think Anderson would want to entertain the thought
of having Donald Trump's face added to Mount Rushmore. He can correct
me if I'm wrong. Actually that stance would up his odds of being
re-elected.
Who would pay for the Mount Rushmore thing?
I am only vaguely familiar with Mr. Anderson.
He's new to those of us in Morris. Shall we assume he's proud to be a
Republican? If so, why not a little affirmation? Or, is a part of him
embarrassed by the antics of some of his political brethren on the
national stage? I mean, like the one who jokes about bulls impregnating
cows, as the likes of Tom Cotton and Rick Scott stand behind him trying
to keep serious looks on their faces. The guy's in the news today for
flashing a "prop" police badge in a debate.
Remember
when Herschel Walker was in the news for coming to the Vikings in a
trade? A trade with the Dallas Cowboys, pretty good for the Cowboys as I recall.
A blue/gray thing?
What
about Lindsey Graham, the guy from South Carolina who tosses up
scattershot thoughts? Many of these weird Republicans come from states
of the old Confederacy - not a likely coincidence. The media does not make this observation often enough. John Harwood did - he was axed by CNN.
The
rhetorical bomb-throwers are leading a political party around that
ought to be more mature. I assume Paul Anderson would want his party to
have the rational stance about things. Be temperate sometimes. But maybe
he's nervous about all that is going on.
Just
check in with cable TV news on any given day. I no longer get standard
TV but I can catch all these programs through YouTube. That's a pleasant
surprise I got when I cut the cable. A few years ago I could not live
without TV. Today it's quite practicable.
So
we're left wondering, based on Anderson's promo stuff, just what party
he's in. If he was trying to avoid anything contentious with this thing
in our mailboxes, it should fail.
The
photo of Paul Anderson at right is with a 2012 article headlined
"Anderson endorsed at GOP convention." (Hometown News photo)
Now,
Paul Anderson might seem like a totally agreeable person if you were to
meet him. I am actually certain of that. He seems to have a thing
about women and abortion. This isn't in his flier, but Rep. Anderson has
a grade of "F" from Pro-Choice Minnesota.
It was just in 2021 that Rep. Anderson co-authored
HF 1099 which aims to limit the use of funds for state-sponsored health
programs for funding abortions. Then in 2022, Rep. Anderson co-authored HF 3291 which establishes "Choose Life" special license plates.
Pro-Choice Minnesota considers these measures "blatant attempts to ban abortion care."
Different playing field now
Simply
stating pro-life might not have seemed so drastic when women had the
protection of Roe vs. Wade. We all know, thanks to Trump's three Supreme
Court appointees, Roe vs. Wade was scrubbed after 50 years. How often
does the Court take away a right from people?
'Til
now we have been partly just amused with Trump and his flock with the
likes of Herschel Walker. Oh, there's a litany. We must stop the mere
amusement and realize: all that has gone on in the last few years should
prompt a clarion call.
If
Paul Anderson is a little embarrassed to be a Republican now, I wish
he'd step forward and frankly state his concerns with the bomb-throwing
element of his party (metaphorical reference). The GOP everywhere has
become so cowed. Maybe you should just square with us, Rep. Anderson, on how you at least subconsciously feel disturbed about elements in your party, so much so, you don't wish to affirm you're a Republican in your leaflets.
Your
Republican bedfellow Michelle Fischbach was one of those to vote
against certifying the 2020 election results. Not even Tom Emmer did
that. I'm no fan of Collin Peterson, as he campaigned in 2020 like he
wasn't even proud to be a member of his party. He was bludgeoned with a
simple photo that showed him and Nancy Pelosi, just smiling very
pleasantly. So that's some sort of cudgel.
Maybe Rep. Anderson has some inhibitions about his own party? Behind closed doors, he's fine with his party. Maybe the public image is getting some baggage. I'm being generous.
Important
side note: when researching this gentleman, please don't confuse him
with former State Senator Paul Anderson of the Twin Cities area.
An accurate lens
Let's
give credit where credit is due: Rep. Anderson did vote yes on a
resolution condemning the "violence and violent rhetoric" at the nation's capitol. Rep. Jeff
Backer, meanwhile, our former state rep, was one of just eight
representatives, all Republicans, to vote "no." What an asshole. The vote was 111-8 on January 25, 2001.
So
Rep. Paul Anderson of Starbuck is not a crazy but it appears he's
totally in league with the anti-abortion element. Anti-abortion forces
are now weaponized with the Supreme Count's ruling that destroyed the
Roe vs. Wade precedent. Elections truly have real world consequences.
I
am concerned about the issue, but in a more broad sense I am alienated
by so much of the Republican Party, a party which believe it or not once
believed in personal modesty. Amazing. Today they are scared to
criticize an ex-president who openly drops the f-bomb, as in "General
Mark Milley is a fucking idiot." I wish General Milley had been our
president, democratically elected of course.
So
this morning, without even checking, I know Trump is all over the the
headlines. Like it's "Groundhog Day." Maybe Trump simply wants attention
and he pulls strings thusly. So it's a concerning mental disorder.
Narcissism? But it's a problem for all of us now. It threatens women's
reproductive health rights.
So in light of that I proclaim: "Vote Edie Barrett."
There
is now a wonderful billboard on the northwest edge of town that shows
Barrett and Kari Dorry. Doggonit Kari, I have to confirm the spelling of
your name every time I type it. Carrie Dorrie? Cari Dorrey? Well, just
takes some discipline. We'll all get familiar if she succeeds vs. Torrey
Westrom, he of the dodgy residency status. Unfortunately, I doubt the
odds are high of that happening, or of Barrett knocking off Paul
Anderson.
Westrom
would not be so cavalier about his residency if he was a first-time
candidate. His biggest accuser on this front is not even a Democrat.
Barrett and Dorry are both from Ortonville, nice town.
The
Republicans appear for now to be in the driver's seat here in rural
western Minnesota. It is possible to get sick of Democrats if they get
too much power. But right now the "Republicans" are making me puke. I wish I did not have to express this in such a manner. There is an undercurrent of something truly dangerous in America now. Diagnosing it may go beyond our general understanding of the political parties and their agendas. Actually the underlying problem may not be political; I would assert that the central bank (the "Fed") is at the heart. It's under the radar screen. Is another round of "QE" coming? Are we headed toward digital currency?
Addendum: Fresh news as of yesterday, is that Trump acolyte Roger Stone called Ivanka Trump an "abortionist bitch." Such sunny, positive individuals. Alex Jones just did an interview on "Newsmax." Why is anyone interested in even talking to Alex Jones? Well, it's "ratings."
No comments:
Post a Comment